Scaling Thin Glass Use to the Architectural World |
Data dodania: 11.10.19 |
Thin glass is the product of choice for electronic device displays. This glass is commonly expensive aluminosilicate glass whose properties are significantly enhanced when subjected to chemical tempering.
AGC recently developed a special glass composition (commercial name Falcon glassTM) that can be produced by a standard float line and on which chemical tempering is very effective.
The convenient price due to standard float production alongside with the excellent mechanical properties arising from chemical tempering make Falcon glassTM suitable for unprecedented thin glass applications in architecture.
In order to explore the potential of Falcon glassTM destructive tests were performed to evaluate the failure stress of glass under different tempering conditions and when subjected to ageing. Reference soda-lime-silica glass was also tested.
It was shown that Falcon has excellent mechanical properties after chemical tempering and that its stress at failure does not decrease when subjected to artificial ageing, in contrast to what happens for soda-lime-silica glass.
Different chemical tempering settings were also explored, showing that longer treatments do not impact the stress at failure, but they allow to build a larger case depth, which improves further the ageing resistance. Fig. 1. Potential of Surface compressive Stress and Case depth build-up during ionexchange for SLSG, ASG and FalconTM glass
(...) Factors limiting the use of thin glass in architecture
Chemical tempering process consists of immersing the glass into a melted KNO3 salt bath (at about 400°C - 460°C) for a given amount of time (commonly between 1–24 hrs) [1].
The conditions during chemical tempering favour K+ in the bath to replace smaller Na+ in the glass structure. The shrinkage of potassium ions to occupy the place of sodium ions generates a compression on the glass surface that can be as high as 1000 MPa [2].
The high surface compression alongside with the slenderness of the panel gained the interest of engineers, architects and researchers to exploit the potential of this material in architecture.
Overend et al. [3] studied the strength and the post-fracture performance of a triple laminated assembly comprising thin CT-ASG as outer face and conventional soda- lime-silica glass (SLSG) in the core.
Lambert and O’Callaghan [4] identified three possible field of applications for thin glass: laminated plies where one or more layers are made of high-strength thin glass (for anti-explosion for example); cold bent panels; tensile membrane structures.
The slenderness of the glass suggested to study movable façade elements, such as canopy [5] or adaptive façade panels [6].
Experiments to exploit the mechanical strength of the glass whilst limiting its deformation were made by Akilo [7] who combined in a composite panel thin CT-ASG with a 3D printed plastic core and by Guidi [8] who added the cold bending feature to the work of Akilo.
However, there are two main reasons why thinglass has not yet boomed in the architectural world, namely:
ASG is too expensive because the raw materials need much higher temperature for melting than SLSG, which implies that the oven requires higher quality refractories (i.e. more expensive) and its operational life is shorter than that of a standard float. Furthermore, the production yield is much lower compared to a standard float line.
SLSG does not benefit from ion exchange as much as ASG does. Datsiou and Overend [9] tested artificially aged CT SLSG, finding a significant decrease in strength, due to artificially generated flaws being larger than the case depth (25-30 μm only [10]).
However, the case depth in CT ASG can be as high as 100 μm [11], suggesting that a glass with such a case depth would be much more reliable against ageing, but was not extensively tested to date.
Therefore the question: is there a thin glass cheaper than ASG but capable to build-up a residual stress with a case depth larger than that of SLSG?
Falcon glassTM
Falcon’s potential of developing surface compression and case depth compared to ASG and SLSG is illustrated in Figure 1. It can be observed that FG outperforms entirely SLSG and partially overlaps with ASG offering an unprecedented trade-off between cost and efficiency of chemical tempering.
The chemical differences between the tin and air side are such to influence the rate of ion-exchange, therefore an anti-warpage treatment is needed to balance the reactions and ensure the flatness of the panels after ion-exchange Figure 2. A summary of FG’s properties in Table 1.
There are few challenges in processing thin glass that should be taken into account:
It is possible to hand-cut thin glass, but due to its thickness specific tooling and full flat and rigid surface support is needed. To ensure a good edge-quality it is preferable to use techniques capable of a good edge finish without further processing (i.e. laser-cut).
Lamination and coating on thin glass have no particular restriction at a theoretical level, but the industrial equipment that is actually used for standard glass might not be capable of handling thin glass. On this subject industrial trials are on-going.
Fig. 2. Difference between anti-warpage treated glass and non-treated
Fig. 3. Large deformations in 0.5 mm Falcon glass during coaxial double ring test
Fig. 4. Fragmentation test on Falcon glass. No safe-fragmentation observed
Mechanical testing
The most promising methods for testing thin glass consists of pure tensile test [14] or constant radius bending [13]. However, 2.1 mm thick glass can still be tested with the conventional coaxial double ring (CDR) or 4-point bending.
Coaxial Double Ring Test for 2.1 mm thick glass
The chemical tempering cycles are 460°C for 8 hours and 460°C for 24 hours. The sand abrasion consisted of 0.90 m high fall of 750 g of sand, with 500 μm average grain size, impacting the air side of the glass at an angle of 45°. After sand abrasion the glass was kept for 24 hours in lab conditions before destructive testing.
A summary of the series is shown in Table 2. Before the CDR test a transparent adhesive film was placed on the tin side of the glass to keep the glass fragments together after failure and locate so the origin of failure. Specimens were always tested with the air side in tension.
The CDR setup was installed on an Instron machine fitted with a 30 kN load cell. The loading and reaction ring measured 20 and 80 mm in diameter, respectively.
The test was performed by applying a stress rate of 2 MPa/s. Load at failure was recorded and stress at failure determined according to the elastic theory, as described by Zaccaria and Overend [15], although slow crack growth was not accounted for in the current study.
Two-parameter Weibull statistical analysis was performed on the failure stress data to identify the failure stress for a given probability.
Namely, 1% probability of failure is reported in Table 3 along with Weibull parameters, average surface residual stress and relative case depth.
The Weibull parameters are:
Residual stress and relative case depth were measured on the air surface of each specimen by means of a differential stress refractometer (DSR).
The fracture pattern of the broken specimens did not show potential of spontaneous breakage as per thermally tempered glass (Figure 4), therefore safety thin glass ought to be laminated glass.
Table 1. Relevant properties of FalconTMglass
Table 2. Summary of test series
Table 3. Summary of test results
Discussion
Although the actual gain of FG over SLSG arise from the artificially aged series, i.e. series 3 with 5 and series 4 with 6, respectively.
Falcon glass was not affected by ageing. It can be observed that the failure stress for FG at Pf = 1% FG 325 MPa and 331 for the CT only and the CT + sand abrasion series, respectively, whilst SLSG failure stress is 293 and 59 MPa, respectively (Figure 6).
This means that the artificial ageing deleted the surface residual stress returning a glass which has the same performances of non -CT asreceived SLSG (series 1). This can be explained by the difference in case depth 48 and 24 μm, respectively.
Smaller case depth means higher impact of the flaws on the failure stress of glass. Comparing artificially aged FG with SLSG it can be concluded that at Pf = 1% FG failure stress is 5 times higher than SLSG.
Another interesting result arises when comparing FG with different tempering cycles (Figure 7). The failure stress at Pf = 1% is almost the same (325 and 322 MPa for 8 and 24 hours, respectively). However, the case depth is much larger in the cycle lasting 24 hours, 48 vs 78 μm, respectively.
This suggest that FG undergoing a 24 hours ion exchange at 460°C is stronger than FG tempered for 8 hours at 460°C despite this difference is not perceivable without ageing. In terms of surface residual stress it can be noted that FG can build-up much larger surface stresses than SLSG (564 vs 385 MPa for FG CT and SLSG CT, respectively for 8 hours at 460°C) and that longer tempering time generates a stress relaxation as the surface residual stress decreases from 564 to 428 MPa for FG tempered for 8 and 24 hours.
It should be noted that the sand abrasion technique used was not calibrated, in the sense that it was not studied how the artificial sand abrasion relates to a natural ageing reference time. However, it is clear that larger case depth ensures a protection against ageing.
Large case depth can be achieved by float produced FG, chemically tempered for 24 hours. Furthermore, if for example FG is to be used in the core of a laminated unit, its surface would be protected by the outer plies and therefore even smaller case depth (i. e. obtained by ion exchange for 8 hours at 460°C) would be effective to ensure failure stress which would not be affected by ageing.
Fig. 5. Weibull plot comparing FG and SLSG CT at 460°C for 8 hours
Fig. 7. Weibull plot comparing FG chemically tempered glass at 460°C for 8 and 24 hours
Conclusion and future work
The difference in stress at failure is even larger when comparing artificially aged series (331 vs 59 MPa, respectively, i.e. 5 times higher). This can be explained by the case depth, which in falcon glass, for the settings used in this study, is about double than that of soda-lime-silica glass when tempered with the same conditions (48 and 24 μm, respectively).
When comparing Falcon glass subjected to ion exchange with different parameters (i. e. 460 °C for 8 and 24 hours, respectively) it can be observed that the failure stress at Pf = 1% does not change, although the case depth does (48 vs 79 μm, respectively).
This would suggest that when processing Falcon glass to a longer ion-exchange for a given temperature, ageing resistance will increase.
Acknowledgements The author would like to thank researchers and technicians of the Glass Melting & Refractories and Transformation department of the Technovation centre for their precious work and advices.
The article is based on the lecture presented at the GLASS PERFORMANCE DAYS 2017 Conference, which took place on June 26-28, 2019 in Tampere, Finland
Marco Zaccaria
References [2] A. K. Varshneya, “Chemical Strengthening of Glass: Lesson Learned and Yet To Be Learned,” International Journal of Applied Glass Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 131-142, 2010. [3] M. Overend, C. Butchart, J. O’Callaghan and M. Prassas, “Glass reinforced glass,” Glass Performance Days, 2013. [4] H. Lambert and J. O’Callaghan, “Ultra-thin High Strength Glass Research and Potential Applications,” Glass Performance Days, pp. 95-99, 2013. [5] J. Neugebauer, “A movable canopy,” International Conference on Building Envelope Design and Technology. Advanced Building Skins, pp. 318-325, 2015. [6] R. Ribeiro Silveira, C. Louter and T. Klein, “Flexible transparency - A study on Adaptive THin Glass Facade Panels,” Challenging Glass Conference, vol. 6, pp. 135-148, 2018. [7] M. Akilo, “Design and analysis of a composite panel with ultrathin glass faces and a 3D-printed polymeric core,” Msc thesis, University of Bologna, 2018. [8] M. Guidi, “Thin Glass Cold Bent Sandwich Panel,” MSc Thesis, TU Delft, 2019. [9] K. Datsiou and M. Overend, “The strength of aged glass,” Glass Structures and Engineering, 2017. [10] A. K. Varshneya, “The physics of chemical strengthening of glass: Room for a new view,” Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, vol. 356, pp. 2289-2294, 2010. [11] A. J. Burggraaf and J. Cornelissen, “The strengthening of glass by ion-exchange. Part I. Stress formation by ion diffusion in alkali aluminosilkicate glass,” Physics and Chemistry of Glasses, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 123-129, 1964. [12] I. Maniatis, G. Nehring and G. Siebert, “Studies on determining the bending strength of thin glass,” Structures and Buildings, pp. 393-402, 2014. [13] J. Neugebauer, “Determining of Bending Tensile Strength of Thin Glass,” Challenging Glass Conference, vol. 5, pp. 419 - 428, 2016. [14] F. Oliveira Santos, C. Louter and J. Ramoa Correia, “Exploring Thin Glass Strength Test Methodologies,” Challenging Glass Conference Proceedings, vol. 6, pp. 713 - 724, 2018. [15] M. Zaccaria and M. Overend, “Thermal Healing of Realistic Flaws in Glass,” Journal of Material in Civil Engineering, vol. 28, no. 2, 2016. [16] K. C. Datsiou and M. Overend, “Artificial ageing of glass with sand abrasion,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 142, pp. 536 - 551, 2017. (...)
Całość artykułu w wydaniu drukowanym i elektronicznym Inne artykuły o podobnej tematyce patrz Serwisy Tematyczne
|
Czytaj także --
- Numeryczne modelowanie parametrów współczynnika przenikania ciepła okien i ścian osłonowych Część 2
- Właściwości modułu folii PVB wg współczesnych norm europejskich
- Kontrola szklanych fasad
- Numeryczne modelowanie parametrów współczynnika przenikania ciepła okien i ścian osłonowych Część 1
- Następny krok w rozwoju oszklenia strukturalnego – cyfrowe projektowanie i produkcja
- Opcje dla elewacji o złożonej geometrii – gięcie na zimno pojedynczego narożnika vs. gięcie swobodne
- Inżynierskie programy komputerowe do określania oddziaływania uderzenia ciałem miękkim na przeszklone powierzchnie
- Analizy porównawcze badań wspornikowych balustrad ze szkła laminowanego – balustrad o pełnoskalowych wymiarach, analiz MES i wymagań ASTM E1300
- Gięte szkło – nowe możliwości w kształtowaniu szkła architektonicznego
- Ulepszona metoda efektywnej grubości dla wspornikowych balustrad ze szkła laminowanego
- Innowacyjna technologia gięcia szkła do wykonywania fasad szklanych o wyrazistym kształcie z ostrymi krzywiznami
- Folia PVB, szkło laminowane i okucia do balustrad wolnostojących zgodnie z normami krajowymi w Europie
- The Future of Software in Glass Processing
- Regulacja zużycia energii poprzez kontrolę dostępu światła dziennego
- Pomysły na wykorzystanie cienkiego szkła do zastosowań architektonicznych
- Dostosowanie cienkiego szkła do użycia w architekturze
- Ustawienia pieca zoptymalizowane z nowymi metodami pomiaru anizotropii i zamglenia (haze)
- Ulepszanie projektowania giętych szyb zespolonych
- James O’callaghan zdobywcą Nagrody Jormy Vitkala w 2019 roku (The 2019 JORMA VITKALA AWARD OF MERIT)
- Sprawdzanie szyb zespolonych wykorzystywanych na nowoczesnych fasadach
- Mobile-Friendly Glass – Comparing Solutions from the End User Viewpoint
- Maksymalizacja przezroczystości fasad dzięki silikonowym ramkom dystansowym Crystal Clear
- Glass Performance Days 2019 tworzą dziedzictwo szkła
- Full-surface and Non-destructive Quality Control and Evaluation by Using Photoelastic Methods
- Is Current Sizing of Float Glass Structures too much Conservative?
- Wpływ nierównomiernej wymiany ciepła w procesie hartowania na jakość szkła
- Wpływ rozkładu naprężeń szczątkowych na badania wytrzymałościowe
- Ponad 700 uczestników weźmie udział w konferencji 2019 Glass Performance Days
- Wpływ starzenia na właściwości pękniętego szkła laminowanego
- Verification of Insulating Glass Units in Modern Curtain Wall Facades